|
Dutch
Barn Preservation Society
Dedicated
to the Study and Preservation
of New World Dutch Barns
NEWSLETTER
SPRING 2001, Vol. 14, Issue 1, part two
THE PLACE
New York State in 1680
(Continuing the series on the history of the
American Dutch Barn)
by Robert J. Andersen
... In the beginning there were trails and Indian fields. After
54 years of settlement (1626-1680) the population of New York State
reached 9,830, and it extended from Manhattan to Schenectady, for
164 miles, and from Manhattan to Gardiners Island, for 105 miles.
The farms were located close to the Hudson River and Long Island
Sound. These waters provided the only means of transportation through
the state.
The cropland consisted of the Indian fields that could be bought,
the flood plains that could be readily cleared, and the glacial
deposits of Long Island. They included, upstate, the flats of the
Mohawk River at Schenectady, ten miles of Hudson River bottomland
at Albany, and the flood plains of the Catskill, Esopus, Roundout,
and Wallkill Valleys. Down state were the vast Hempstead plains
and the rest of Long Island and the islands of Staten and Manhattan.
It would take another 90 years to extend the frontier 60 miles
up the Mohawk and Schoharie Valleys.
The colonist found conditions as described by C.O. Sauer in The
Yearbook of Agriculture 1941, Pg. 159.
"This was indeed a lustier land to which the settlers
had come, a land of hotter summers and colder winters, of hotter
sun and more tempestuous rain, a land suited to and provided
with a greater variety of vegetation than the homelands of
Europe. In one important respect only was it strikingly inferior
to northwest Europe - the quality of the grasses. There was
grass aplenty, both in wet, low meadows and parklike openings
or glades in the upland woods, but mostly it furnished rather
poor feed. Some like the broomsedge or broomstraw, became harsh
as it grew. Almost none of the native grasses withstood trampling
and grazing. The annual grasses died off if heavily pastured,
because they did not get a chance to seed; the perennials had
delicate crowns that ill stood the abuse of heavy grazing.
In clovers and other herbaceous legumes, a similar inferiority
may be noted for the eastern American flora as compared to
the European."
The above dissertation explains the dilemma facing the colonial
farmer of New York in his search for a product to barter and sell.
The Hollander accustomed to the alluvial Rhine River delta, for
most of Netherlands was that, found those soils scarce in New York,
and the arid climate would not support the lush pastures that Holland
was known for. As late as 1960 found 60% of Holland's farmland
still in Pasture while New York had only 20%. In England the figure
was 79% pasture.
Netherlands in 1960, with 2/3 the land, had amazing production
compared to New York. Table 1 shows 4 times the small grain, more
potatoes, about 2 times the cattle, and 14 times the swine. The
density of people is also surprising, 10 times the people per square
mile.
Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3
The weather, which the colonists found in the new
world, as compared to home, had some intriguing aspects. New York
was wetter (Table 2 and 3) but had twice the evaporation. (Table
3) In aggregate New York came up short in residual moisture and
was a good deal short in the growing season. Northern Europe on
the other hand, was in a perpetual fog. Moisture was abundantly
available for plants and the temperature did not reach extremes.
New York was fully 10 degrees warmer and 10 degrees colder. On
arrival the New York colonists, no doubt experienced their first
dry summers. This was beneficial for drying grain and hay but was
devastating for pasture. At one time, during a drought, the author
saw a farmer in Rensselaerville, New York felling saplings, so
that his cows could eat the leaves when the pasture was gone.
The Colonists had to forego extensive dairying. They soon found
that the wheat that they abundantly grew, for their own bread,
was indeed a marketable product. The records show that for the
first hundred years, wheat was by far the largest export for the
State and was second only to tobacco for the Nation.
In 1680 there were 8 jurisdictions in New York with structured
Government and law enforcement. The character of these neighborhoods
can be assumed from the scale of this sample Levy imposed on all
the Counties in 1681.
(Juray, Cornell "Historic Chronicles of
New Amsterdam, Colonial New York and Early Long Island. II
Vol. III p.447)
Table 4, part one
Using the percentages above, an estimate of the distribution of
the population, is made in Table 4. (The total population is from
US Colonial Statistics.)
The colonial farmer paid taxes much as we do today. The big difference
was the method used to calculate the tax. In the late 1600's assessments
were based on Poll, land and animals while today they are based
on land and buildings.
Table 4, part two
1680 The Towns of New
York State 1680
Table 5
*The Dutch Towns included-Flatbush, Brueckelen, Bushwyck,
New Utrect, and Flatlands. The English Towns included Gravesend,
Newtown, Flushing, Huntington, Brookhaven, Southhold, Smithtown,
Jamaica, Hampsted, and Easthampton. (Gravesend is included with
the English on the one hand and with Kings County on the other)
SUMMARY: The DUTCH farms were twice the size of
the ENGLISH farms. The DUTCH farms were much older and this may
explain the difference. The ENGLISH had less horse but more oxen
by a considerable margin. Virtually every farm had cows, ENGLISH
and DUTCH. The ENGLISH had a strong leaning toward sheep. The interval
between assessments show the DUTCH increasing the number of farms
by 7 while the ENGLISH soared by 145. The ENGLISH had the biggest
and the most in every category except one.
FARM POPULATION (From Table 4, levy of 1681 at 95%)
KINGS CO. COUNT 1201 ON 181 * FARMS = 6.6 PEOPLE PER FARM
QUEENS + SUFFOLK 2882 ON 416* FARMS = 6.9 PEOPLE PER FARM
LONG ISLAND COUNT 4083* /15654* ACRES = 3.8 ACRES PER CAPITA
NEW YORK STATE 9726/6.75* PEOPLE PER FARM = 1440 FARMS TOTAL
*Interpolation for 1681.
Broad Axe Demonstration
Recreation Day at the Wemp Barn,
Summer 1991.
Photo by Amelia Andersen
Our vote for the most picturesque Dutch barn site.

The
Dutch Barn Preservation Society
c/o
The Mabee Farm Historic Site
1080 Main St. (Rt. 5S)
Rotterdam
Junction, NY 12150
Site
Phone: (518) 887-5073
DBPS
SITE MAP

Copyright
© 2007. Dutch Barn Preservation Society. All rights reserved.
All items on the site are copyrighted. While we welcome you to
use the information provided on this web site by copying it, or
downloading it; this information is copyrighted and not to be reproduced
for distribution, sale, or profit. |